You might have seen that the Gers report is to be published on Wednesday morning, but what exactly does Gers stand for?
The report is exclusive to Scotland and was first introduced in 1992 by the UK Conservative Government to help inform the case on devolution.
Now in its 29th year, the report continues to have an important impact on Scotland and the independence debate.
Here's everything you need to know about Gers.
What does Gers stand for?
Gers stands for Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland; the annual report which estimates the difference between Scotland's gains in taxation and what it spends on public services.
In recent years it has played a particularly important role in the independence debate, with both sides interpreting figures to support their arguments.
Former UK Prime Minister John Major first introduced the report in 1992 as a means of weakening the case for the formation of the Scottish Parliament; he thought the report would demonstrate the significance of the UK Treasury's contribution to Scotland.
The Scottish Government has been responsible for compiling the figures since devolution in 1999.
What does this year's report show?
Like previous years, both sides of the independence debate are using the Gers report to argue their cases.
SNP ministers have said that the figures demonstrate that Westminster is "actively harming" Scotland's economy, accusing them of treating Scotland as an "afterthought" with the report expected to show a huge deficit in the country.
Meanwhile, unionists have said this claim is "ludicrous" and that Scotland's being part of the UK has "safeguarded so many jobs and livelihoods over the past year".
The anticipated 25% deficit in GDP for the last tax year means that the gap between money raised from taxation and public spending was almost triple that of 2019/20.
It's a record no one will be celebrating, with the biggest previous deficit since devolution 10.4% in 2009/10 following the economic crash.
This is largely due to lockdown's economic impact which cut tax revenues and required huge public spending, so much so that the UK Government sent an extra £8.2 billion in support funds.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here