QUESTIONS have been raised about claims by a former SAS sergeant turned TV star and author that he was involved in the “mercy killings” of Iraqi soldiers.
Sources have told a newspaper that Colin Maclachlan’s claims in his new book that he helped end the lives of wounded Iraqi troops 13 years ago were “utter b******t.”
The Times also alleged that former colleagues said he had misled the public by suggesting that he survived a hostage-taking and rescue in Iraq in 2003. It was also reported that questions were being raised about his claim to have spent between 10 and 12 years in the SAS.
Read more: Georgian mansion goes on sale for the price of four-bedroom home in Edinburgh
In the Iraqi soldiers’ incident, the 42-year-old from Edinburgh had claimed have faced the choice of either ending the soldiers’ suffering or leaving them to die slowly in agony.
He said the motives were “entirely humane” as the man were “pleading for us to do it” and were in ‘agony.’ Mr Maclachan, who appeared in Channel 4’s Who Dares Wins, added: “We also knew how we would have wanted to be treated in that situation. The crueller thing would have been to continue their suffering.”
He is facing an investigation by the military police into the claim.
Read more: Georgian mansion goes on sale for the price of four-bedroom home in Edinburgh
The Times reported that his former colleagues were challenging a claim he was one of two SAS members taken hostage in Basra in September 2005. Mr Maclachlan had claimed they were stripped and put through mock executions at rifle-point.
The Ministry of Defence said at the weekend it would investigate “credible allegations” of criminality.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here