Next to the war memorial in the village of Rothley, Leicestershire, a candle still burns for Madeleine McCann, who vanished from her parents' holiday apartment in Praia da Luz, Portugal, 14 months ago.
Five days after the three-year-old disappeared, friends and neighbours of Kate and Gerry McCann held a silent vigil, tying yellow ribbons around railings on the village green and lighting candles in a show of solidarity with the family.
Yesterday, as it emerged that Portuguese police have handed over their final report to prosecutors, who will consider the files before deciding whether to end the investigation or carry out further inquiries, residents of Rothley once again spoke out in support of the McCann family.
They also criticised the police investigation and said they hoped that once the case was officially closed, private investigators could take it over and find Madeleine.
Heather Wheeler, who lives in Rothley, said: "The Portuguese haven't been straight from the start and I think they ought to leave them alone. ."
Village postmaster David Lynch said if the police investigation was brought to a close, it "may be a good thing because the private detectives can then come in and look for her". Speaking in a radio interview, he added: "The most important thing is to find Madeleine. People are really with the McCanns."
The investigation into Madeleine's disappearance has been beset by leaks and allegations of a police smear campaign against Mr McCann, 40, and Mrs McCann, 39. Officially Portugal's Policia Judiciaria does not comment on ongoing cases, on pain of breaching the country's strict "secrecy of justice" laws.
But developments have frequently made their way into the Portuguese press, with yesterday's reports that detectives are to shelve the case in the latest in a line of leaks by "unnamed police sources". The couple's naming as "arguidos", or official suspects, in September last year followed weeks of reports in the Portuguese media, vociferously denied by friends of the couple but greeted with the usual "no comment" by police.
As the investigation approached its first anniversary, a police statement given by Mrs McCann was leaked, revealing that on the morning she vanished Madeleine had asked: "Mummy, why didn't you come when we were crying last night?" Mr and Mrs McCann's spokesman Clarence Mitchell reacted by saying that the couple had been the "victims of leaks and smears".
A team of Portuguese detectives then travelled to Britain and spent several days sitting in on fresh interviews with the group of friends who were eating in a tapas restaurant with the McCanns when Madeleine disappeared. After the interviews, the McCanns renewed their calls for their "arguido" status to be lifted, saying the friends' stories had been consistent with what they had said before.
But the closest the Policia Judiciaria came to acknowledging that the interviews represented a step forward was when it countered Mr Mitchell's accusations that police had deliberately leaked information about the investigation.
In a rare statement, the police said it regretted the "baseless intervention of the spokesman above all at a moment when significant moves were being made in the investigation".
Last night, as friends and family waited to hear whether the latest developments would result in the couple's "arguido" status being lifted, Susan Bates, who lives close to Rothley, said: "I feel for the McCanns. I don't think the Portuguese police were very good in the early days. Not like police here, who would have been on the ball straight away."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article