If you like your family melodrama ripe and theatrical, complete with skeletons in the closet, monstrous matriarchs and damaged children ready to bite back, then Osage County is the place to be.
Tracy Letts adapts his Pulitzer Prize-winning play, which concerns the gathering of an Oklahoma family on the disappearance of its patriarch. We briefly glimpse Beverly (Sam Shepherd) in the company of his wife Violet (Meryl Streep). And while it seems unfair to condemn a woman with cancer, it's not surprising when this chap - an ageing poet and drunk - finally jumps ship.
And so the couple's daughters and partners descend on the family pile: Barbara (Julia Roberts) and her cheating husband (Ewan McGregor), Ivy (Julianne Nicholson) who is secretly dating her sweet but dim-witted cousin (Benedict Cumberbatch, miles away from Sherlock) and Karen (Juliette Lewis) with her latest, brash boyfriend (Dermot Mulroney).
They're here to lend support to Violet, a pill-popping harridan who promptly throws it back in their face.
The centrepiece of the film - the tour-de-force that no doubt earned Streep her 17th Oscar nomination - involves a family dinner in which Violet spectacularly tears into everyone around her. As Beverly opined before he departed, it's an apt "punchline" that his wife's affliction should be mouth cancer.
It's directed by John Wells, still better known for ER than his movies, but more than able to helm a talky piece like this. The acting's the thing, from a terrific ensemble. The stand-out is not Streep, in fact, but Roberts, as the daughter who can feel herself becoming her mother. When Barbara rips into Violet at dinner, snarling that "I am running things now", one can't help cheering.
In a place where we are told parakeets are dying from the heat, Roberts and co ensure that the emotional temperature is just as hot.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article