Love & Mercy (12A)
three stars
Dir: Bill Pohlad
With: John Cusack, Paul Dano, Elizabeth Banks
Runtime: 121 minutes
THIS look at the life of Brian Wilson starts in blinding sunshine of the type Glasgow sees with the regularity of Halley's comet. Carrying a surfboard like an umbrella for shade, the five Beach Boys look like poster children for not just Sixties America but boy bands in general. There they are, larking around, riding the crest of a pop cultural wave. How did Wilson, this bright young thing, come to be such a deeply troubled man?
In answering that question, Bill Pohlad's meandering but thoroughly entertaining drama rejects a straight course between two points. The screenplay, after all, is by Oren Moverman, whose portrait of Bob Dylan enlisted an entire band of actors, including Cate Blanchett and Heath Ledger, to sum up the greatness of His Bobness.
Here, Pohlad and Moverman confine themselves to just two actors - Paul Dano playing the younger Wilson, and John Cusack the older. Even so, you may feel that is still one Brian W two many. While the approach brings home the transformation in Wilson, it also makes for a film that is sprawling and overlong. Even though we spend two hours in the man's company it still feels, frustratingly, as though only a part of the story has been told.
Pohlad assumes some degree of prior knowledge, quickly moving from the Wilson who has already achieved fame in his youth to the lost soul of the Eighties who wanders into a luxury car showroom where he meets a saleswoman, Melinda Ledbetter (the always fabulous Elizabeth Banks). Ledbetter cannot work out why this man is minded as if he was a child,and of particular concern is a therapist, Dr Landy (Paul Giamatti), who seems to be with him 24/7. But a connection has been made between Ledbetter and Wilson, one that Landy is at first keen to encourage but then frowns upon as his influence begins to lessen.
As Pohlad cuts back to the Sixties we see that there was an earlier, equally domineering figure in Wilson's life in the scowling form of his father, the band's manager. The story explores this relationship, plus the increasing gulf between those Beach Boys who wanted to carry on doing more of the same and Wilson, who always wanted to push the envelope to tearing point. Between all this and what is going on in the Eighties, there are several motorways full of emotional traffic whizzing by in Pohlad's film. At certain junctions he lingers far longer than is necessary to get the point. Wilson, though a singular force, needed people. Most of all, he needed music.
Love & Mercy is at its best when it cuts through the white noise of Wilson's relationships and arrives at his cool, clear brilliance. Not a lot of time is wasted on the earlier, poppy material, with Pohlad concentrating rightly on the more complex compositions, and the creation of Pet Sounds in particular. While some of the cues to the songs border on the outrageously cheesy (a conversation about a dog and how they pick up vibrations between people leads to... you've guessed it), the scenes in the studio, with Wilson pouring blood, sweat and tears into getting the sound just right, show the inspiration/perspiration mix of genius at work. Pohlad also has something of an obsession with God Only Knows. Since it is one of the most beautiful love songs in pop, that was absolutely fine by this viewer
Given the quality of the music and the performances (with Dano just edging it over Cusack, largely because he has more of a transformation to portray), one can easily forgive the narrative sprawl. Even more of a treat is seeing Wilson at the end, performing the title track. At long last, the king of harmonies looks at one with himself.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article