If there were any doubts about expectations surrounding The Hobbit, they evaporated at the recent world premiere in New Zealand.
Middle Earth's the Shire – or at least a bit of it – had been recreated in downtown Wellington. Giant model trolls looked on as thousands of fans – many dressed as elves, dwarves and wizards – lined the snaking 500m-long red carpet. "I Bags Bilbo" read one sign held up by an adoring fan in the hope, perhaps, of catching the attention of British actor Martin Freeman, the star of this feverishly anticipated take on JRR Tolkien's 1937 classic children's novel.
Looking at Freeman, his blue eyes hidden behind tinted Ray-Bans, it was hard not to think of our encounter two months earlier in a discreet London hotel. Tim from The Office, Arthur Dent in The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy, Dr Watson in Sherlock – he has played his share of iconic characters, but Bilbo Baggins is something else entirely. Never mind a year shooting in the Shire, Freeman's typical English reserve had left him in restrained mood. "I never felt, 'Martin, you're the Hobbit.' I never felt it, and I haven't felt it yet," he told me. "I might do at the premiere."
While the 41-year-old was joined by such A-list co-stars as Cate Blanchett, Evangeline Lilly and Elijah Wood, there was one man to rule them all. Peter Jackson, New Zealand's favourite son, stood flanked by the country's Prime Minister John Kay and the mayor of Wellington, Celia Wade-Brown. The filmmaker, who turned New Zealand into a major tourist destination after his landmark take on Tolkien's fantasy trilogy The Lord Of The Rings, looked on, almost overwhelmed. Nearly a decade on, he was back to present part one (of three) of his LOTR prequel The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. Rarely, though, has a title been so apt.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article