His status as a Python and a colourful career as a filmmaker have made Terry Gilliam something of a national treasure.
But it is almost 20 years since he made his last memorable movie, Twelve Monkeys. And the goodwill is wearing thin.
Set in the future, The Zero Theorem stars Christoph Waltz as Qohen Leth, a reclusive loner who lives in a dilapidated chapel and steps reluctantly into the world only to go to work at the Mancom Corporation. There he "crunches entities" alongside other geeky geniuses, though what exactly that means is never explained.
Leth is gripped by a Beckettian existential crisis. Convinced he is about to receive a phone call that will explain the purpose of his life, he begs his manager (David Thewlis) to allow him to work from home so he does not miss it. He is granted his wish on condition he works on the corporation's top secret project, solving the Zero Theorem.
Scriptwriter Pat Rushin is attempting a commentary on faith, technology, marketing, therapy, online sex and the meaning of life - and there is the problem. Gilliam needs a script that keeps him focused. Instead, his storytelling is all over the place, to the point where it becomes plotless and monotonous.
Most surprising is that Gilliam's imagination is so off the mark. In his previous science fiction films, Twelve Monkeys and Brazil, his baroque, retro-futuristic visual sensibility served his conceits; here, we have a Day-Glo, mix-and-match dystopia that never allows us to suspend our disbelief.
There are enjoyable cameos by Matt Damon as Leth's shadowy boss and Tilda Swinton as a virtual therapist. And Waltz gives it everything. But this is Gilliam's fifth middling film in a row. Let's hope his long-cherished project, The Man Who Killed Don Quixote, will break that pattern.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article