Here's a lovely old granny in a pale-blue coat with her silver hair all curled and set.
And here's that lovely old granny spitting nastiness about another woman. "She's a dirty great fat lump of lard," she shouts, her lips curled back so we can see her teeth. And here's another granny talking about the same woman, with the same venom. "She wants shooting," she says. "Because she's dirty. DIRTY."
What on earth can this be? What can transform women in this way? What turns grannies into monsters? Or am I being sexist? Or sneerily middle-class? That's the problem with wrestling. For some reason – and I have no idea what it is – certain women loved its play-acted violence and its blood, but it's hard to criticise them, or wrestling, without appearing snooty.
One interviewee in Timeshift: Wrestling's Golden Age (BBC Four, Thursday, 9pm) says it was this kind of middle-class snootiness that killed wrestling off as a TV sport in the 1980s. Television producers decided audiences did not need fat ex-miners in Lycra even though fat ex-miners in Lycra seemed to make lots of people happy at four o'clock every Saturday afternoon.
And he's half-right, that wrestler, because there were two reasons wrestling disappeared from television. One was, indeed, the middle-class factor – essentially, TV producers in Margaret Thatcher's 1980s began to see that the working-class audience, the non-aspirational audience, weren't the kind that would attract nice advertisers. They didn't need them so they got rid of them.
But the documentary makes something else clear, and it is just as important: wrestling killed itself. The whole thing began as an entertainment in the music halls, with fighters rolling a mat out on the stage. Then, in the 1930s, a wrestler called Norman Morrell rebranded it a sport and brought it into the mainstream. By the 1960s, it was a television hit. By the 1970s and 1980s, 16 million people were watching. But we learned in the Timeshift doc that even in the early days of wrestling's television success, the promoters were dictating who should win fights because they needed a soap-opera narrative with characters. Most of the wrestlers, though, maintain they were taking real knocks, and the clips of wrestlers with their faces busted open would seem to back that up.
By the middle 1980s, however, wrestling had been belly-butted into a different era entirely – it had been refined so much that there was more acting than sport, and not even very good acting. It was pantomime, with goodies such as Big Daddy, and baddies like Giant Haystacks or Klondyke Kate, the woman at the receiving end of those venomous grannies. TV gave up on it.
And despite those accusations of middle-class sneering, that was the right thing to do. Not because of the faces of those grannies transformed from sweet to hate, although they were disturbing. Rather, wrestling had to go for another reason. The mission of culture – low and high – should be to become more interesting, more exciting and more inventive. But wrestling had become unsophisticated, a circus act. It wasn't a sport, it was bad art. And it didn't die, it was put down – for purely artistic reasons.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article