Much has been written about the production problems behind zombie blockbuster World War Z, including major reshoots and the scrapping of a 12-minute Russian battle scene that must have cost millions.
Then there are fans of the source novel, by Max Brooks, lamenting its radical adaptation.
It just goes to show that the only thing that counts is what's on the screen before you. For this is a cracking piece of entertainment, an edge-of-your-seat, spectacular horror-cum-action movie that doesn't relinquish its grip for a minute. A little like its monstrous hordes, World War Z really doesn't mess about.
We're used to zombie movies focusing on the small scale, with a group of protagonists holed up in a cabin or shopping mall, carnivores banging at the door. As his title suggests, Brooks's vision was a tad bigger than that. The film opens with a brief, no-nonsense prelude via television screens of brewing global catastrophe – an outbreak of rabies here, panic and social breakdown there. The world is so accustomed to tension, that it's entirely off-guard as a pandemic takes hold.
In the Philadelphia home of Gerry Lane (Brad Pitt), his wife Karin (Mireille Enos) and their two daughters, the mood is relaxed. What's martial law, one of the girls asks dad as she watches TV. "House rules for everyone." A UN investigator who's left his job to spend time with his family, Gerry is determined not to have a care in the world.
Breakfast over, they drive into town and an unfeasibly heavy traffic jam. The film is barely five minutes old; this is usually the time for character development and other preliminaries. Not here. Suddenly, all hell breaks loose.
The overrunning of Philadelphia by zombies is the first of three stunning sequences (Jerusalem and a passenger plane providing the others), with Glasgow's Merchant City and George Square standing in handsomely, heroically for the American city. The crowds are totally unprepared for the swarm of fast-moving human monsters attacking them – a far remove from the lumbering boneheads we know and love – which grows as each victim transforms within seconds.
The Lanes' escape is aided by the government, which whisks them away to an aircraft carrier. From here, Gerry – a war-zone specialist – is despatched to find the source of the plague, and hopefully a cure.
Whereas Brooks's book had multiple perspectives, the film chooses just one. Rather than narrow the global reach of the story, this approach actually intensifies it, as we experience Gerry's exhausting journey in search of answers: to North Korea, which provides a blackly comic vignette, with one gruesome yet practical way to avoid infection; Jerusalem, where Israel's usual skill for self-preservation through containment backfires; and to a laboratory in Wales, where the film switches to that more familiar zombie scenario – a handful of survivors, a room with answers, a corridor full of zombies blocking the way.
Alongside the atypical zombies is an atypical hero, Pitt's extremely engaging performance putting more textbook action heroes in the shade; how smart to play Gerry as a family guy, without strut or ego, who just happens to be extremely capable.
In keeping with the speed that the pandemic sweeps the globe, director Marc Forster drives the action along at an exhilarating pace. What his film lacks in cohesive plot is more than made up for by efficiency – it is thrilling, tense, occasionally scary, visually extraordinary. His ending may be much more low-key than a Russian battlefield, but it works, because like much of the film it's the very last thing we'd expect.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article