THE intention behind the opening concert in the Queen's Hall series on Saturday morning had been to celebrate the legacy of Britain's great contralto Kathleen Ferrier through the performance of two recent winners of the Kathleen Ferrier Award, often a springboard for young professionals.
They would perform alongside the great British baritone Sir Thomas Allen and the massively experienced pianist, Roger Vignoles.
It didn't quite go according to plan. One of the two winners, South African baritone Njabulo Madlala, was stricken with a chest infection and withdrew late last week. Whether they considered a replacement I cannot say; but they decided just to tweak the programme a little and run it with last year's winner, the stunning mezzo Kitty Whately, who was in Perth in May, singing in the very funny ETO production of the Barber Of Seville.
It would have been a relatively informal occasion anyway, I suspect; not one of those heads above the parapet, display-type shows. But with the late changes to line-up, what emerged on Saturday was a lovely, intimate concert, with Tom Allen garnishing a version of Come You Not From Newcastle with his wholly authentic Geordie accent (he's a Durham man) while Whately, unaccompanied, opened the proceedings with Ma Bonny Lad.
More traditional numbers followed, including Afton Water, Early One Morning, and a riotous account from the two singers of The Mermaid. In between they poured out gorgeous music, including a rich performance of Gounod's Barcarolle, a sultry, intense account of Debussy's Chansons De Bilitis (Whately) a sonorous Brahms's Sapphic Ode (Allen) and a time-stopping performance of Vaughan Williams's Silent Noon.
HHH
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article