THERE are a number of observations that ought to be recorded about the concert celebrating the 75th anniversary of the Gannochy Trust, featuring the RSNO and a series of Perth's musical luminaries on Saturday night.
The first is that, simply, it was a major event, highlighting the unstinting support of this great trust, without which there would probably be no Perth Concert Hall, all that goes on in it and all that it stands for on Scotland's musical scene. There should be a hall of fame to the towering supporters of Scotland's music sponsors and champions. The Gannochy Trust would be in the premier league.
The second observation is that the quality of musicianship from Perth Youth Orchestra players was outstanding. Side-by-sides between professional and non-professional (or student) players are common these days. The Gannochy anniversary show, in this respect, was the real thing: cutting-edge; players from Perth Youth Orchestra, mentored by RSNO players, took all the principal parts, all the major solos, in extracts from Bizet's Carmen, featuring superb Perth-born mezzo Rowan Hellier in the title role. Their achievement was astonishing.
Somewhat less than astonishing, however, was the second-half performance of Rachmaninov's Second Piano Concerto, with Alasdair Beatson, Christian Kluxen and the RSNO. I stand second to none in my admiration of Beatson as chamber music pianist. But something didn't work here. He was fluid and expressive, but why were there so many instances in the concerto where band and soloist were obviously not together, with the orchestra jarringly behind the beat? Beats me why they couldn't get it together.
HHH
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article