Music
BBC SSO, City Hall, Glasgow
Michael Tumelty
Five stars
WHAT a night on Thursday. and what a blockbuster of a concert from the BBC SSO and conductor Andrew Litton. If ever an orchestra rose to an occasion it was the SSO on Thursday, and they hit everything in that programme with a full-on, bulls-eye performance. Not an orchestral stroke missed the target.
New pieces are vulnerable, of course, as the fast-rising young composer Mark Simpson discovered when his new composition, Israfel, got boo-ed a bit.
Never mind that lot: let 'em boo; who's listening? It was a good piece, ambitious in its canvas, short, but of epic dimensions, wide-screen in its feel, but with a melodic spirit at its heart.
And what do we say about Peter Donohoe's sensational performance of James MacMillan's riotous Second Piano Concerto with, in its first section, some of the fastest piano writing I've ever heard, elsewhere percussive pianism of such pile-driving clout it leaves Bartok sounding tame, music of archaic grace making itself at home with unfamiliar companions, a slurpy sentimental waltz, madcap hi-jinks and the maddest, most drunken reel imaginable? I've been listening to Donohoe for decades: this was the man at the top of his game, at the peak of his power. And right at the heart of this pluralistic concerto was some of MacMillan's most intense string writing, such as we have known since 1989.
It all had to be followed by a classic to round off a stunning night, and Andrew Litton, with the SSO at its most full-blooded, provided the solution with their broad, dark and richly-coloured performance of Rachmaninov's Second Symphony, golden in warmth, pulsing with emotion.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.Â
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.Â
That is invaluable.Â
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article