Music
BBC SSO, City Hall, Glasgow
Michael Tumelty
Four Stars
EVEN to committed and unrepentant Bruckner-phobes, there is something special about the composer's Fourth Symphony, the so-called Romantic; and I think I know what it is. It's more taut than others in its construction. It doesn't spread itself expansively and repetitively over 90 minutes or more. It says what it has to say in just over an hour. But it needs to be interpreted and performed in that way: it doesn't just happen. A determined, long-distance Brucknerian can make it seem infinitely more spacious, monumental and eternal.
But that was not the approach of conductor Mark Wigglesworth in his big-boned, majestic but rather urgent performance of the Fourth Symphony with the BBC SSO on Thursday night. At every turn, and in all of its dimensions, from its big structures to its progressive phrasing, from its repetitions, which had a rare cumulative effect, to its overall sense of momentum, which had an equally rare, continuous sense of purposeful forward movement, this interpretation was a vision and a performance of the Fourth that was symphonic to the core: it was as electric and as dramatic as Beethoven. It didn't feel like monolithic blocks of sound: it felt like sound in motion; it seethed in the sheer dynamic of its events, and it gripped from each of these to the next, building all the while, with the SSO performance blazing in detail, immediacy and intensity.
It was an unforgettable performance, preceded by a heart-stopping, equally memorable account of five of Mahler's Knaben Wunderhorn songs, delivered by mezzo Alice Coote with purity and opulence, poignancy and passion, though a little short on textual clarity.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article