The premiere of Igor Stravinsky's ballet The Rite Of Spring, in Paris in 1913, famously led to disturbances in the aisles.
There was no danger of such incivility during Thursday evening's performance of Scottish Ballet's minimalist Rite by the company's artistic director, Christopher Hampson.
Performed on a smart, off-white, abstract set - which had three walls, rounded corners and looked like a cross between a gladiatorial amphitheatre and a latter-day skateboard park - the mass scenes typically associated with the ballet were replaced by a mere three dancers: two brothers (initially wearing simple, black skirts), joined by an elegant and aloof black-clad young woman.
The seeming solidarity between the siblings, and the instruction of the younger by the older brother descends into physical abuse. The older brother reappears in army fatigues, demanding the younger man's gestural allegiance to something which is militarist and nationalist. His failure to do so, in his observable preference for the unattainable woman, leads to his head being covered by a bag, Abu Ghraib-style.
There is no doubting the momentary beauty or the occasional poignancy of the piece. However, there is a deftness to Stravinsky's musical juxtapositions which is not matched by Hampson's lurches into very literal images of fascistic violence.
There is, surely, no work in the repertoire which contrasts more with Hampson's piece than Kenneth MacMillan's 1974 ragtime ballet Elite Syncopations.
Inspired by the music of Scott Joplin, with extraordinary, garishly coloured costumes (based on the outrageous fashions of early 20th-century United States), it is a plotless pleasure of competitive dance and comic turns. The comic moments - such as a short, hapless man trying to dance with a tall, elegant woman - remind us that deliberately getting dance "wrong", slapstick-style, is an accomplished art in itself.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article