Music
Maxwell String Quartet, Cottier's Theatre, Glasgow
Michael Tumelty
Four stars
A GREAT feature of the Cottier Chamber Project is the focus it gives on the repertoire: not throwing spotlights on performers, occasions or events per se, but on the actual music. Nobody knows better than musicians the highways and byways of the music written for their instruments. So the question is not just: do you want to play in the Cottier Chamber Project? It's more like: do you want to play in the CCP and what have you got to bring?
And that was a pertinent issue in the early evening concert on Tuesday from the young, eager and increasingly well-placed Maxwell String Quartet who produced two string quartets that effectively are rarities, in Shostakovich's Tenth and Carl Nielsen's First. Hands up: who knew the Nielsen? When was the last time you heard it? How often have you heard Shostakovich's Tenth in concert?
The Maxwells were brilliant in Nielsen's First Quartet, which, though obviously based on native folk material and traditional elements, was punctuated with little shocks of volatility that clearly hinted at seed elements of the volcanic eruptions of music to come from the great Dane. And that was really worth hearing.
As too was the Maxwell Quartet's Shostakovich 10, where the group had a fine command of the first movement's elliptical material, and where they caught the confidentiality of the music by scarcely letting it raise its voice, which thus gave huge impact to the slashing attack of the second movement: a great quartet, given its Western premiere in 1965 (and recorded) by the Weller Quartet, founded by Viennese violinist and conductor Walter Weller, who has just died.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article