SCO
SCO
City Hall, Glasgow
Michael Tumelty
AS EVER, there are many perspectives from which the SCO's tremendous concert with Robin Ticciati on Friday night might be appreciated. But the one that struck me particularly was the core consistency of playing from an SCO with more than a few unfamiliar faces in the ranks: the playing was never less than comprehensively homogeneous.
But more than that, it seemed to provide the glue that gave a programme which contained extraordinary variety from classical, ultra-Romantic and contemporary periods of music a special coherence: bluntly, everything on the programme seemed at ease with everything else; the whole thing was a lovely and touching entity.
Not even the harshest and most horridly graphic sounds from Toshio Hosokawa's riveting and deeply-moving Meditation on the helpless victims of the 2011 tsunami, whose ravages I will never forget, jarred with any other emotional aspects of the programme.
And has Karen Cargill, plumbing the endlessly rich depths of her lower register in Mahler's Songs on the Death of Children, ever sung with more depth and intensity of feeling? If ever there was an exemplification of dignity in grief, it was enshrined in her time-stopping performance. And has there been a more beautiful sound from the SCO than that achieved exquisitely in Mahler's ravishing Blumine?
And then, from the midst of all this heartbreak, anguish, loss and reflection, the fact that Ticciati and the SCO, at their classiest, released a cathartic energy in a dazzling performance of Haydn's London Symphony that was a life-force encapsulated in pure sound and drive, was a master-stroke in planning with the most serendipitous outcome. All these emotions, packed into a single great concert: what a night.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article