Not Fade Away 1987: Sign O' The Times, by Prince.
"My name is Prince and I am funky …"
Mind the gap. We've jumped from pop's patron saint of sexual frustration to its imp of polymorphous perversity. Now that's a segue.
On the whole the difference between the Smiths and this week's choice is that Prince's music said nothing to me about my life. But I guess that's what I loved about it. In 1987 no one - not even Morrissey and Marr if I'm truly honest (though it's a close-run thing) - thrilled me as much as Prince. He offered a vision of pop that was excessive, strange and, yes, downright kinky.
Set aside hip hop, and you could argue that Prince was the alpha and omega of American pop music in the 1980s. He took all his influences - Little Richard, Hendrix, Sly and the Family Stone, the Beatles - and made them fuel for his own rewriting of black music.
Not that he would ever limit himself in such a way. Prince was colour-blind when it came to music. He'd play anything, take on any form, any genre and shape it to his own ends.
He could rock out (The Cross), strip things back (Kiss), paint in primary colours (U Got the Look) or keep it monotone (Sign O' the Times is the best example, but When Doves Cry might qualify too).
At the same time he was following very obvious black precedents - most notably Al Green and Marvin Gaye - in the way he fused sensuality and spirituality. In Prince's world sex equalled love equalled God. Or vice versa. Presumably Madonna had been listening when she came to write Like a Prayer.
The God bit I could do without myself. And thinking about this I realise that I probably know less about Prince Rogers Nelson than almost anyone else in this list (with the exception of Augustus Pablo). But I don't feel I'm missing out on anything. For me Prince was never about biography. He was about fantasy. It didn't take much listening to imagine he had issues with his father, but really what fascinated was the libidinous world he luxuriated in and the ludicrously easy facility he had with music.
In 1987 he was at his most casually brilliant (and given how casually brilliant he'd been in the years before that's quite a claim). It was a cliché even at the time that if the double album Sign O' The Times had been a single disc it would have been up there with all those records that keep getting name-checked as the greatest of all time.
But maybe we need to see Prince in terms of his prolificacy. That he needed to be constantly creating, constantly recording, to get to where he wanted. To get to where we wanted him to be.
And Sign O' The Times is still rich with great songs. Even the one with Sheena Easton on it. But the two that stand out are the title track and If I Was Your Girlfriend.
The latter sees Prince's obsession with sexuality come to a head (ahem). It's the story of a man imagining being his girlfriend's female friend and what that could entail. As such it's part sex fantasy, part interrogation of gender, couched in a slow fug of funk. It was too wayward, too sexually ambivalent for an American audience and didn't chart in the US at all.
In its wake Prince's loverman persona was always much more macho in expression (think of Get Off and Sexy MF).
I should choose If I Was Your Girlfriend for that very reason, for its daring, its libidinal openness. But then I hear Sign O' The Times, and my ears start to burn. It still sounds like the most potent thing Prince ever did.
I guess it's a protest song about the state of the world. It seems to rail against drugs and gangs and the Aids virus and nuclear destruction and the explosion of the space shuttle Challenger, though you're never really clear who Prince is blaming for all this (and from the recorded evidence Prince is, if anything, something of a conservative politically). Dorian Lynskey argues in his book 33 Revolutions: A History of Protest Songs, that the track is "hopelessly toothless and noncommittal as a protest song", but he adds, "brilliant as a pop record".
And that's what I love about it. The sound of it, the way Prince bites down on the word "Crack" (which always makes me think of how the sound surges on Family Affair on the word burn), the stripped-down Sly Stone funk it uses to carry the words, the way it dissolves into a vision of love and marriage and parenthood "we'll call him Nate … if it's a boy").
In the end I guess this is as close as Prince came to engaging with the real world. You can attack him, I suppose, for the evasive way he did it. But you can't complain about the sounds he conjured up in doing so. Prince has always lived in his own head and not in the real world. Sometimes that seems like the better place to be.
Other Contenders
If I Was Your Girlfriend, Prince
Last Night I Dreamt Somebody Loved Me, The Smiths
I Won't Share You, The Smiths
Rent, Pet Shop Boys
King's Cross, Pet Shop Boys
Paid in Full, Erik B & Rakim
Fairytale of New York, The Pogues featuring Kirsty MacColl
True Faith, New Order
Pump Up the Volume, M/A/R/R/S
Brilliant Disguise, Bruce Springsteen
I Could Never Take the Place of Your Man, Prince
Death of a Disco Dancer, The Smiths
Big Decision, That Petrol Emotion
What Have I Done To Deserve This?, Pet Shop Boys & Dusty Springfield
Boops (Here to Go), Sly & Robbie
Birthday, The Sugarcubes
NME Single of the Year: Sign O The Times, Prince
John Peel's Festive 50 winner: Birthday, The Sugarcubes
And the best-selling single of 1987: Never Gonna Give You Up, Rick Astley
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article