Our verdict - three stars
For the 20th anniversary of the MTV Europe Music Awards you'd think they'd pull out all the stops, the big names. Instead they pull out all the apologies: Miley Cyrus was sorry not to make it, One Direction were sorry, Katy Perry was so sorry she didn't know which way was up.
Best Song With A Message was won by Beyonce for Pretty Hurts, beating Arade Fire's We Exist. Beyonce couldn't make it and neither could Justin Beiber, who won Best Male.
Those who could make it - Enrique Iglesias, Ariana Grande, Charlie XCX, Alicia Keys and Slash - all put a shift in.
Ms Keys, heavily pregnant, was the only lady of the night to keep her clothes on.
For the rest it was energetic dancing, pyrotechnics and grinding.
Apart from U2, fortunately. No one needs to see Bono grinding.
Nicki Minaj's Anaconda was matched only by Enrique Iglesias' snake hips.
Ed Sheeren proved a huge hit, or at least was hugely hyped.
He did a very good job and was among the most low key performances of the evening.
It was all simulataneously tacky and tame.
One quite wished for Miley Cyrus to appear live (she played via pre-recorded video) and, as in Amsterdam last year, be spanked by a dwarf.
Just so there'd be something to tweet home about.
David Hasselhoff wore a kilt and Minaj pretended to care about Scotland.
There was golf, a traffic cone and one of the boys from Biffy Clyro made a token appearance with Slash.
From the security at the venue and the levels of hyperbole you'd think Michael Jackson had risen and returned to play.
As it was, it was glitz, guts and pop names who may not be household in another 20 years time.
All fine stuff but just no more than fine.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article