HHHH
Anyone fearing that we were being invaded as the RSNO began the final instalment of Saturday's Mediterranean interlude might have had good cause. Even guest conductor Gilbert Varga looked a little panic-stricken as he gazed over his shoulder up to the balcony while ushering on his charges onstage. Varga was, of course, only ensuring the auxiliary horns upstairs were on cue.
Or he might have been ensuring the hairs on the backs of people's necks were sticking up; in your reviewer's case, they were. This happened more than once and not just during Respighi's Roman Festivals, which brought this concert to a close by, in places, making the chariot race from Ben Hur seem like the Badminton Horse Trials by comparison.
There was drop-dead gorgeous playing in all the preceding pieces, including guitarist Milos Karadagli's encore of a solo milonga to follow a vivid reading of Rodrigo's Concierto de Aranjuez, which contained flamenco gutsiness as well as finely measured phrasing.
Varga brought out all the detail – beautiful rolling waltz-time cellos in Respighi's Ancient Airs and Dances; a particularly lovely bass sound in the second movement of the Rodrigo – with apparently little effort. But he threw himself into Roman Festivals with an enlarged orchestra absolutely alert to the composition's big stabbing punctuations juxtaposed with the gentlest murmurings of strings, the discreet work of 10 percussionists and even a mandolin cameo.
This was Roman hedonism writ large, with mad carousels – or maybe carousals – and a revelling trombone adding to a spectacle that could have resulted in carnage, but was brought to almost pictorial life with marvellous expertise.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article