HHH
THIS is very personal, so possibly a lone view; but there seemed to me a dichotomy, if not several dichotomies, between the music programmed on Friday night by the SCO and its performance.
One piece displayed absolute integrity of interpretation and performance: that was Wagner’s glorious, exquisitely intimate Siegfried Idyll, upon which Robin Ticciati and his peerless band lavished thinking and playing of supreme sophistication and elegance, drawing from the composition all of its wonderful motivic clarity without impeding the progress of the music.
They did that too with Franz Schreker’s Chamber Symphony, a fascinating stylistic melange of impressionism, atmospheric music, high Romanticism, slightly diluted expressionism, and every shade in between. But it remained just that: a melange, with little sense of shape and direction, which went on and on.
Faure’s Requiem, on the other hand, despite the piecemeal nature of its creation, has a lovely unity of sonority and colour: it is never vivid or bright: it is the smoothest musical velvet with a warm, slightly dark hue.
But Ticciati broke all that up on Friday night in a version whose basic tempo was on the swift side, and whose microcosmic attention to nuances of phrasing and dynamics, with a lot of surging and swelling, got in the way of the gentle flow of the music. The balance of the SCO Chorus, within itself and with the orchestra, was at times uneven, soloists Carolyn Sampson and Neal Davies were fine, but the electronic organ was clunky, leaving the ethereal, weightless In Paradisum firmly earthbound, a contradiction in terms if ever there was one.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article