SOME years ago I reviewed a CD recording by a young German conductor, David Afkham, and wasn't particularly impressed.
Afkham, now in his 30th year and significantly matured, is becoming a figure in demand and, by and large on Friday night with the SCO, you could see why.
With Beethoven's Coriolan Overture as its crisp, tight, tangy and dramatic starter, and the SCO massively compact with a whole palette of dynamic contrasts on display, the concert could hardly have had a more effective launch.
At the other end of the night, with the SCO in blazingly incisive form, demonstrating its rarity in immaculately-graded ensemble-playing (how do they do this?) Afkham presided over a performance of Schubert's Ninth Symphony that delivered its enormous structures with a light touch, wholly-buoyant rhythms and an airy quality. Even the endless Scherzo went like the wind.
But really the night belonged to the astonishing Swiss-Italian pianist Francesco Piemontesi for his dazzling and amazingly fleet performance of Mendelssohn's First Piano Concerto, one of those rare performances that reveals the mastery and genius of a composition and asks why we hear the piece so infrequently. The playing of the slow movement, which threw a spotlight on the lower strings of the SCO, was breathtakingly tender and beautiful.
And then, having stopped hearts with his own pristine, exquisite playing in the slow movement of the concerto, Piemontesi went on to break them with an encore of a slow movement from one of Schubert's Piano Sonatas: music so simple it could be played by a capable student; music so profound it could have been uttered by a philosopher. A good night.
HHHH
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article