the machine gun and skye's band of brothers
the machine gun and skye's band of brothers
BBC TWO, 9.30pm
Gun versus man: man loses. Gun versus a thousand men: man still loses because the gun is the Maxim, which the Germans used so precisely during the First World War
The historian and film-maker Neil Oliver explores the story of the gun as well as some of the men it killed, in this case soldiers from Skye who went to the front together as part of the Cameron Highlanders.
In the First World War, friends signed up together and served together, shoulder to shoulder. It meant that one burst of machine gun fire could hit scores of men from the same village, farm, town or factory. Oliver describes the dreadful human cost of the Maxim that could fire 666 rounds per minute.
The gun had been invented by an American living in London. Yet it was the German army who built them in great numbers and also learned to deploy them with mathematical precision on the Western Front.
In The Machine Gun And Skye's Band of Brothers, the development of the science of the gun is interwoven with the story of the small company of soldiers that would come to face these horrific weapons.
Oliver's journey begins at the rolls of honour in the Scottish National War Memorial in Edinburgh Castle, which contains lists of casualties from the Scottish regiments, grouped together in clusters of the same places of birth and death.
He then follows the stories of the soldiers from Skye who went to the Front together as part of the Cameron Highlanders. Drawing on letters that the men sent home and the details of the battles they fought, the documentary gives a poignant account of their lives and destinies.
The programme is part of the BBC's World War One Centenary season, which has included debate, polemic, drama and documentary and, so far, has got the tone just right.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article