A Terrible Beauty
A Terrible Beauty
Oran Mor, Glasgow
Mary Brennan
IT only takes a moment. A signature on a treaty, a word said - or not said - and history changes. The history that Ian Pattison fixes on here is the Irish civil war, which saw words give way to firearms, and escalate from guerilla skirmishes into all-out battles between two opposing groups of Irish nationalists. He homes in on the pivotal figure of Michael Collins, Commander in Chief of the Free State - pilloried and outcast by the Republican supporters of Éamon de Valera for signing an Anglo-Irish treaty they felt betrayed all they'd fought for in the recent Irish War of Independence.
No need, really, to spell out what attracted Pattison to the events of 1922. Because in the dialogues Pattison creates between Collins, and Republican go-between Crowley, are all the issues of national identity, self-determination, decision-making - and degrees of trust in those who make the decisions at the highest level - that have been running through our own approach to the referendum on Scottish independence. There's no partisan bias in Pattison's dynamic short play - directed with unfussy briskness by Liz Carruthers - but there is a profound, and poignant sense of how good intentions cannot guarantee anything. And John Kielty's Collins - full of tinderbox passion that sparks as readily into dry humour as it does into angry denunciations of the opposition's tactics - is cogently aware of how vehement idealists don't necessarily make the most useful negotiators. George Docherty's sober-suited Crowley is cunning incarnate: superficially affable but wily with an edge of menace - as the hapless note-taking McPeak (Gavin Wright) discovers in the wake of Collins' death. Another moment that changed history: almost a century on it still resonates.
Sponsored by Heineken
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article