Behaviour
Cock and Bull/Anonymous P, Arches, Glasgow
Keith Bruce
four stars
Nic Green billed her timely deconstruction of the verbal and gestural language of modern (right-wing) politics as "a scratch performance", but that was rather belied by the precision of its execution by herself, Laura Bradshaw and Rosana Cade. A piece that made suprisingly musical use of familiar cliche, and found rich choreographic material in conference platform pacing and the TV sofas of political punditry, it was also, as you might expect, about the male dominance of those, ballot box crosses in black electrical tape over the women's nipples beneath their men's garb.
As exhausting to watch as it self-evidently was to perform, it lost some narrative clarity as the suiting was shed, Cade eventually centre stage in only the sort of foil wrap given to long-distance runners at the finish line, and fluffy carpet slippers. The second section, Dedication, was more reliant on music than the movement that drove the first, entitled Exorcism, and further development of the work might usefully engage another hand in honing the scoring of very promising piece.
If Cock and Bull inevitably recalled the work of Laurie Anderson at times, Chris Kondek and Christiane Kuhl's Anonymous P owes a clear debt to New York's Wooster Group, if lacking the slickness of execution. Interacting with the smartphones of the audience in sometimes disturbing ways, the company occupy two arches with an installation that bristles with technology but is often at its best when it is simplest. At heart a disturbing wake-up call about how we are all tracked and monitored in every moment of our lives, and collude surprisingly willingly in this surveillance, it employs classical myth and archive footage (particularly amusingly of a young Steve Jobs) in a cabaret that is as seductive as it is scary, if a little shapeless.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article