Where The World Is Going, That's Where We Are Going
Where The World Is Going, That's Where We Are Going
Summerhall
IT probably isn't essential for audiences to know the inner workings of 18th century French philosopher Denis Diderot's novel Jacques the Fatalist and His Master before coming to see the Hof van Eede company's contribution to the Fringe's Big in Belgium strand, but it might help. Jacques, after all, was one of the earliest known novels to mix up the fictional form in a way that questioned the very essence of what a novel could be while also offering up a treatise on free will.
Post-modernism before its time, as one of this show's scholarly protagonists wryly observes.
Things begin casually, with a bookish young man and woman who may or may not be a couple declaring their intention to introduce Diderot's ideas to us as they might in a lecture or a book group. Over the next hour of flirtation, bickering, misunderstandings and sixth form level misinterpretations of personal politics, the pair skirt around each other in a discursive and wilfully without punchline piece of self-referential meta-theatre.
Among a series of fascinating elucidations on Amazonian archers, true love and other great adventures, one is reminded both of Ronnie Corbett's weekly armchair monologues on The Two Ronnies as well as the regular opening exchanges between the happy couple giving their own particular and often contradictory versions of events in 1970s sitcom No Honestly.
While neither of these reference points are likely to be big in Belgium, they're no more out there than other exchanges in Ans and Louise Van den Eede's script. By the time performers Jeroen Van Der Ven and Ans Van den Eede go onto the streets by way of a short filmed epilogue, mutual understanding has evolved into something else in this quietly witty extended literary gag which invites audiences to do as they please.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article