Pantomime
Beauty and the Beast
Paisley Arts Centre
Mary Brennan
FOUR STARS
You know that disbelief hasn't just been suspended, but has left the building altogether when wee boys are cheering the Beast to snog Bonnie. If, by any chance, the flamboyantly villainous Ratman (a melodramatically mustachio'd Tommy Hart) was squirming out of his come-uppance, those same wee boys - and hordes of equally impassioned wee girls - would rush the stage and put his gas on a peep themselves. Given the easy accessibility of the Paisley Arts Centre stage, such panto justice would be done with gusto, just as the piling on for a final song and dance empties the seating bank of all but the adults who have to act their age, not their shoe size.
For the 27th year in succession, David Wallace - writer, director and un-jaded, game Dame - heads up a production that outclasses many a more lavishly-funded show in terms of daft antics, slick patter and genuine (often improvised!) engagement with the audience. The story-line, too, has its own inventive twists: the Beast, a usurped Prince, lives in the sewers where he looks after the children Ratman has banished there - the youngsters of PACE's Team One are wonderfully Dickensian waifs, as well as townsfolk and evil henchman. While Wallace and his accomplice in mayhem, Alan Orr, keep the panto elements firing on all cylinders, Danny Holmes (Beast) and Karen Fishwick (Bonnie) provide the love interest in a tremendous strand of music theatre that has hints of Phantom of the Opera in its gloomy, underground setting but a stirring score of its own. As village square unfolds into dank sewer, on a stage the size of sixpence, disbelief morphs into amazement - magic!
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article