Dance
Romeo and Juliet, MacRobert Centre, Stirling
Mary Brennan
THREE STARS
Since the late 1930's, the plight of Shakespeare's star-crossed lovers has been like a magnet to choreographers worldwide. Most of them have turned, with understandable enthusiasm, to Prokofiev's score which - once his notion of a happy ending had been dispensed with - fully captures the pomp and pathos, the youthful passion and rigid vendetta at the heart of this tragic romance. On paper, Ballet West's production probably knows what's meant to happen. On-stage, their version falls short of such ambitions simply because - even with professional guest artists helping out in various leading roles - this Taynuilt-based dance school just doesn't have the personnel to carry off the full character of the narrative. Frankly, it doesn't have the choreography either.
What Daniel Job has put together is, shall we say, "horses for courses". This Verona is unnaturally short of men. Does it matter? Well it reduces the Act One rivalry between Montagues and Capulets to a brief clash of foils - and much of that is Tybalt's childishly petulant swishing of his rapier. The macho swagger of the Capulet's ball has to give way to Juliet's girl friends in a cluster while the colourful Act Two festival has cohorts of folk-dancing maidens who more or less hop on the spot to some of the most exhilaratingly dance-y music in the ballet canon.
You glimpse where the show thought it could go in the Romeo and Juliet of Jonathan Barton and Sara-Maria Barton - but while their partnership makes polished work of the duets, as real-life brother and sister the relationship is, of necessity, passionless. At best, it's a serviceable production. The programme, by the way, is a £10 statement of glossy aspiration.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article