Theatre
Scuttlers, Royal Exchange Theatre, Manchester
Colin Donald
Three stars
Between the heyday of the Gangs of New York (1860s) and the age of the Peaky Blinders (gangs of Birmingham, 1900s), Manchester's mill worker suburb of Ancoats was terrorised by the wars of the Bengal Street Tigers and the Prussia Street Gang and other "scuttling" (fighting) tribes.
Rona Munro's new play for the in-the-round Royal Exchange resurrects this long-buried youth culture, giving a good taste of the brutality spawned by the conditions in which the mass of mill "hands" spent their short and scantily-recorded lives.
Directed with tension and aggression by Wils Wilson, and acted with maximum energy by a large and busy ensemble cast, Scuttlers does a fine job in bringing these ghosts of Manchester's past back to vivid life, the sort of heritage service that only theatre can accomplish.
What exactly were these gangs scuttling about? Herein lies the slightly disappointing aspect of the play, as the answer seems to be nothing much more meaningful than the causus belli of today's football rivals, which limits dramatic potential.
Without presuming to imagine her characters inner lives too deeply - although she imparts a lot about their conditions - Rona Munro concocts a thin melodrama about ties across the tribal divide, its crises driven by the actions of damaged young people desperately trying to fulfill themselves.
An earlier generation of playwrights would never have written a play about the industrial workers of Manchester without forefronting the politics, but Rona Munro is less interested in her characters' life of labour than in the style and swagger with which they defied their lot on enforced days off.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.Â
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.Â
That is invaluable.Â
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article