Pantomime
Miracle on 34 Parnie Street
Tron, Glasgow
Mary Brennan
FOUR STARS
??I believe! I believe! I believe!?? The audience is witnessing, like a hot gospel chorus, to the existence of Santa Claus. They??re actually affirming their faith in Johnny McKnight to deliver a panto where old traditions are buffed up with a post-modern polish and his Dame makes us all happy camp-followers. His latest Dame is Kristina Cagney Kringle: the rear that stretches sequins to popping-off point is Kardashian-inspired. Dance moves? A strutting, shimmying, hi-energy mix of Beyonce and Miley Cyrus. The pneumatic Kringle curves are sheathed in a Santa costume that references Mariah Carey??s mini-tunic in the ??All I Want for Christmas?? video.
If these are a few of McKnight??s favourite things, so too is the 1947 Hollywood film, Miracle on 34th Street, in which a court has to decide if Santa Claus (aka Kris Kringle) really does exist. Relocated to 34 Parnie Street, glamorously frocked by Kenny Miller and with musical numbers that go from Motown to A Chorus Line by way of Michelle Chantelle Hopewell??s rockin?? soul-sister anthems, the tale is now a cheeky, cheery and sometimes cheesy salute to Glasgow, and to panto itself. McKnight, in writer/director mode, asks a lot from his cast: they give it glitter-encrusted wellie at every turn ?? and most of them do double turns. Julie Wilson Nimmo is three times a lady, including the uptight Doris who insists her wee boy Snoozy is as hard-bitten as herself. Maybe we do agree (for once) with Darren Brownlie??s slithery-smooth baddie Bellhammer when he says the court scene goes on too long ?? but the McKnight and Miller motto ??more is alway more, less is never enough?? keeps us hooked. Believe it!
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article