Edward Scissorhands
Edward Scissorhands
Theatre Royal, Glasgow
Mary Brennan
Outsiders really do loom large in Matthew Bourne's story-telling hits, but none of them are so obviously set apart from (supposedly) normal life as Edward, the towsy-headed, patched-together lad whose fingers are like switch-blades.
Those shiny, snicketty-snick scissorhands are a challenge in themselves for whoever is cast as Edward, but there's more to the character than costuming extremes. Dominic North is hauntingly attuned to the inner loneliness and vulnerable naivete of the wistful dreamer in Bourne's stage version of Tim Burton's film.
North's performance is persuasively subtle. The flashing scissorhands will always splay out with an implied danger, but his Edward has a child-like quality of bewilderment that lends itself to comedy - why is this woman getting so intimately friendly with me? - but slips easily into heart-rending pathos when his novelty value wears thin and the community of Hope Springs turns hostile.
That community itself is a sly collage of small-town America in the 1950s, squeaky-clean, but with grubby little secrets.
Bourne's astutely-detailed choreography lets you in on who's who and what's what, so that when the stage explodes with big ensemble numbers - the summer barbecue, the Christmas party - the dance does more than cleverly reference period styles, it draws you in to the undertow of rock'n'roll rebelliousness and one-up-manship that Edward can mimic but never be part of.
Could he and Kim (Ashley Shaw, full of cheer-leading bounce) have made it as a couple? Their duets are so joyous and tender, you hope against hope that love will overcome difference and bigoted hatred. At every level, from dance to design, music and showmanship, this is supreme Bourne in action - but take a hanky.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article