Bloody Trams
Bloody Trams
Traverse Theatre, Edinburgh
Neil Cooper
They may not have been tram related, but the roadworks blocking the bus stop on Lothian Road immediately following this 50-minute "rapid response" to the seven-year carry-on that has been the Edinburgh Trams project spoke volumes about the vagaries of civic planners who seemingly give little thought to the everyday consequences of their decisions.
Put together by director Joe Douglas from a series of interviews with those in Edinburgh affected one way or another by the major city centre upheavals caused by the tram-works, what is effectively an extended dramatised vox pop is performed by actors Jonathan Holt and Nicola Roy, with musical accompaniment by composer and singer David Paul Jones on piano.
In an initially comic but increasingly poignant series of exchanges related by the actors relaying recordings of the interviews relayed to them through mobile phone ear-pieces, we hear from the small business people whose livelihoods were all but destroyed, the cabbies whose routes were disrupted on a daily basis, and the bureaucrats putting the inevitable positive spin on things. Most tellingly, there are those who wonder why the old trams were scrapped in 1950s in the name of progress.
What's revealed is both a real- life soap opera and a piece of history which has touched a collective nerve still raw from the experience.
Bloody Trams has also tapped into the increasingly vital question of how public officials can be held to account by the constituents they are there to serve.
With this in mind, if the Traverse wants to really get its hands dirty with civic muck, the similarly long-running shambles of the Caltongate development should be tackled onstage post-haste.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article