I Can't Sing
I Can't Sing
London Palladium
William Russell
This limp musical comedy makes the late, unlamented Viva Forever seem like something by Sondheim. Written by Harry Hill, the hugely popular comedian, with music by Steve Brown, it attempts to send up the X Factor and could have been, but is not, our Book of Mormon.
Had it appeared in the heyday of the X Factor when Simon Cowell ruled over Saturday night TV, it might have been topical, but, although some of Hill's barbs hit home, most land with a dull thud somewhere in the wings.
The show, while amiable enough, is pointless and dated. Cowell, oozing self-love and claiming to be "fabulous", is played to the hilt by Nigel Harman. Being a strapping six footer, Harman is, however, more the man Cowell sees himself as than the man he really is. Hill's plot concerns an orphaned singer called Chenice (Cynthia Erivo), who thinks she can't sing, but of course she can, and her very dull plumber boyfriend Max (Alan Morrisey), who can't, both X Factor finalists.
Erivo has a terrific voice and a good stage presence but the songs she is given are dire.
Part of the problem with the show is that Simon and his chums do not surface until Act Two, an odd decision in a work designed to send them all up.
Hill is a scattergun comic on television so it is no great surprise this is a hit and miss affair with far too many misses. On the plus side Chenice has a talking dog, a puppet manipulated and nicely voiced by Simon Lipkin, who falls in love with Simon; Cheryl Cole gets spit-roasted by Victoria Elliot as judge called Jordy; and there is a hunchback contestant with what all talent show competitors need: a good back story.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article