Cain's Book
Cain's Book
Arches, Glasgow
Mary Brennan
In February 2013, Alan McKendrick edged us into an encounter with the late Alexander Trocchi through (some of the) pages of his last novel, Cain's Book. That first two-hours of live performance was like a masterclass on how to make provocative, entertaining and illuminating theatre on less than half-a-shoestring - the said shoe-string being incorporated into Colin O'Hara's resourceful designs. I doubt if the budget has expanded much since then. But McKendrick's obstinate, visionary commitment to the project is undaunted: this further instalment, again flying the flag of Stewart Laing's Untitled Projects, saw two hours stretch into three, with the pungent addition of a blasting-thrashing live set from avant-rock group Smack Wizards, and a cunningly-crafted, black and white film of children as the drug-taking adult characters voiced (on tape) by Stephanie Viola - having a little lad, in the same houndstooth sweater worn by the on-stage narrators who are all Joe, was just one of those details that murmur of McKendrick's flair and thoroughness.
The footage itself, like the re-iterated 'I'm gonna kick it' sequence where the escalating amount of unpaid rent begs to differ with that statement, had the perfect pitch of Trocchi's own junkie episodes. Awareness heightened - needle-sharp, evocative - yet zoned out, as deadpan as the girly dancers who boogaloo with unblinking gaze or as gently shifting as Joe's scow moored in New York's docklands. Recast - Ian Hanmore replaces Graham F Valentine, but with Lou Prendergast and Ross Mann still on-side - the initial work-in-progress has some tweaks, as well as new sections, but the inherent dynamic continues to be revelatory, celebratory, graphic and inspirational. Even so - four hours? A durational installation? There has to be more chapters.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article