What The Ladybird Heard
What The Ladybird Heard
Theatre Royal, Glasgow
Mary Brennan
IT'S not just in bookshops that the name Julia Donaldson acts as a magnet on young readers. Nowadays stage versions of the stories have an inbuilt box-office appeal. But, as this production - adapted and directed by Graham Hubbard - shows, it's not all that easy to take a very short story, like What The Ladybird Heard, and re-model it into an hour-long piece for large-scale venues like the Theatre Royal.
His solution is to create a bounce-along, joining-in pre-amble where the cast go into a tizzy - they're one man short.
Fathers in the audience must have felt a nervous qualm: was the audience participation going to go as far as acting as one of the bad guys? Before tinies could volunteer their parents, a passing usher (hah!) was pressed into service on a colourfully detailed set that looks like Lydia Monks's illustrations for the book.
Before the story can start, however, there's some hands-on resourcefulness that sees everyday objects - a watering can, a bicycle, a wheelbarrow - cunningly morphed into farmyard animals by the cast of four. We help by doing the appropriate baa-oink-quack noises. And then it's time for Donaldson's clever ladybird to appear, in a trick of the lighting that is too magical to give away.
And yes, the ladybird saves the day, and the farmer's prize cow from the song 'n' dance robbers whose doolally, knockabout style reduces youngsters to fits of laughter.
Even so, there's a sense that those in the circle, or far back in the stalls, don't really get the benefit of the unstinting energy or jolly music-making that's rolling along on-stage. A more intimate space would have drawn everyone into the story we heard.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article