The Night Before The Trial and The Sneeze
The Night Before The Trial and The Sneeze
Tron Theatre, Glasgow
Neil Cooper
WHILE John Byrne's 1960s reinvention of Anton Chekhov's Three Sisters played to packed houses in the Tron's main house, Marcus Roche's bite-size staging of two of the Russian master's miniatures was a fitting curtain-raiser.
Roche himself opens proceedings as Chekhov, manning the decks with some particularly riotous Russian dance numbers on the stereo before reading brief excerpts from his diaries. These are written shortly after the original production of The Three Sisters has been a massive flop, and Chekhov considers penning funnier fare once more.
This leads neatly into Roche's adaptation of the unfinished The Night Before The Trial, in which a man awaits his fate on the eve of being hauled before the court for attempted bigamy and attempted murder.
He is subsequently usurped by a young woman in need of medical assistance he'd be happy to administer if only her pesky husband wasn't also on the scene.
Played script in hand, as if the words were still hot from Chekhov's pen, the story's inconclusive ending segues into Michael Frayn's near-wordless The Sneeze like a Monty Python routine, with its author stepping in, only to keel over so a reserve is forced to take his place.
Adapted from Chekhov's short story, Death Of A Government Clerk, The Sneeze sees a very sticky faux pas during a night at the opera upended into a piece of silent movie slapstick as dexterous as Frayn's own farces.
Both of these fleeting moments of human behaviour are lifted off the page by the production's casually dressed quintet, with an irreverent brio that we need to see more of in productions of Chekhov.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article