Disabled Theater
Disabled Theater
Tramway, Glasgow
Mary Brennan
WHEN the Zurich-based Theater HORA invited Jerome Bel to work on a new company piece in 2012, they knew the choreographer would probably incur hostility and recrimination as well as praise from the audiences who watched Disabled Theater.
The award-winning Bel had no previous experience of working with adults who have learning difficulties, so he took a path familiar to his own practice: he gave the participants a series of questions and tasks that ranged from coming on stage, one after another, to stand silently for a minute through to devising a piece of their own dance. Even on paper, this suggests a mix of confrontation and exposure where it is (deliberately) not clear who or what is being confronted or exposed.
Long before the end, my feeling was that we, the audience, were the ones being challenged - not least because all those on stage had declared their profession was "actor".
Each one had approached the microphone, given us their name, age and mental disability - Down's syndrome, autism, "being slow" - sometimes with a forthright comment, before sitting in the semi-circle of chairs.
Were they being themselves, or maybe performing "as themselves"? What was it we thought we were seeing? Was it the freak show one performer's mother had described it as, even though she liked it? Or was it a statement of personal identity and expressive flair by people whom society tends to marginalise or niche in terms of what we assume they can't do?
If the piece is grounded in honesty and frankness, it also teases and plays with knowingly mischievous humour - Remo Beuggert's rock "duet" with a chair was a classy case in point. Thought-provoking? Remarkably and memorably so.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article