The Guid Sisters
Royal Lyceum, Edinburgh
Until October 13;
King's Theatre, Glasgow
October 23-27
I Dreamed A Dream
Seen at Festival Theatre, Edinburgh
Run ended;
King's Theatre, Glasgow
October 1-13
The Incredible Adventures Of See Thru Sam
Seen at Tron Theatre, Glasgow
Run ended;
Touring until October 20
In 1989 Michael Boyd (then director of Glasgow's Tron Theatre, now outgoing director of the Royal Shakespeare Company) staged the British premiere of Les Belles-soeurs, by the leading dramatist of modern Québec, Michel Tremblay. Adapted into Scots-English by Scots-Canadian writer Martin Bowman and the late Scottish author Bill Findlay, and entitled The Guid Sisters, it was to have a profound impact on the Scottish theatre.
The play – which is, by turns, an uproarious and jet black comedy – opened to the kind of audience and critical acclaim which has rarely been seen since. The story of Germaine Lauzon (winner of a million savings stamps) and the 14 female family and friends who come round to her modest flat for a stamp-sticking party resonated with both Scotland's working-class experience and its irreverent sense of humour. Twenty-three years on, watching this scintillating revival at the Lyceum (directed by regular Tremblay collaborator Serge Denoncourt, and co-produced by the National Theatre of Scotland), it isn't difficult to understand the play's attraction.
The Québecois playwright writes in the working-class Montreal dialect known as joual (or "horse language"). Bowman and Findlay transposed it beautifully into an equally unconventional Scots demotic. Tremblay's comedy – in which the inevitable jealousy of Germaine's good fortune combines explosively with malicious gossip, staunch Catholicism, personal crises and long-standing resentments – is reminiscent of the farces of Molière (another Francophone writer who is close to the Scottish theatrical heart) insomuch as it requires actors to play absurd-yet-recognisable characters with boldness, pace and precision.
These qualities are in abundance in an ensemble which is outstanding to a woman. Kathryn Howden (Germaine) and Karen Dunbar (Germaine's sister Rose) are funny and furious forces of nature. Jo Cameron Brown's pretentious elderly lady Lisette de Courval is hilariously "fur coat and nae knickers" (as the old saying goes), whilst Molly Innes's hard-pressed carer Thérèse Dubuc (whose only respite comes through knocking out her incapacitated mother-in-law) is bleakly funny.
Denoncourt's revival is a superb melange of comic levity and sudden poignancy. Painted across the stage in glorious colour, it has surely made The Guid Sisters a landmark play for another generation of Scottish theatregoers.
If a working-class woman's dreams turn to ashes in Tremblay's play, they are celebrated in some style in the Susan Boyle musical I Dreamed A Dream (co-authored by Alan McHugh and the show's star Elaine C Smith). The piece takes us from the Britain's Got Talent sensation's difficult birth and childhood in West Lothian to the dangerously overwhelming demands of fame and an insatiable media.
The show offers a gratifyingly sympathetic portrayal of a woman whose three-and-a-half years in the limelight have entailed not only mass acclaim for her remarkable singing voice, but also the media's fixation on her physical appearance and her class background. From her schooldays (when her outsider status led to her suffering some horrific bullying), through her tentative and ill-fated first romance, to her meteoric rise to stardom, Smith plays Boyle with a near-perfect combination of diffidence, humour and inner-resolve.
It is, in McHugh and Smith's script, an extraordinary story told, in director Ed Curtis's production, with a slick and straightforward simplicity. The show follows the popular stage-musical formula assiduously. Unashamedly sentimental and given to comic caricature (Andy Gray's deliberately obnoxious, luridly attired karaoke host, for instance), it takes its lead from Boyle's own recordings in giving some unlikely subjects (Lou Reed, The Rolling Stones, Bob Dylan) the stage-musical treatment.
The singing itself is variable. Smith's not inconsiderable voice strains to reach the highest notes of the show's title song. Seasoned musical theatre performer James Paterson (playing Boyle's over-protective father) impresses mightily. Needless to say, there is precious little here for those of us who consider Simon Cowell and his brand of gladiatorial television to be malignant forces in our culture. What there is, however, is a highly polished, technically proficient piece of musical theatre and an undeniably fine appearance, at the end of the show, by Susan Boyle herself.
If McHugh and Smith deliver on their audience's expectations, Johnny McKnight's latest play, The Incredible Adventures Of See Thru Sam, for his theatre company Random Accomplice, seems to be trying too hard to ingratiate itself with the teenagers who are its target audience.
The central concept – Sam views his bereavement, first love and bullying as if it were a comic strip in which he and his parents are superheroes – makes more sense in marketing theory than it does in theatrical practice.
McKnight deals with some emotive issues with an admirable directness. However, his apparent desire to forge an association between his play and his young audience by replicating the more verboten aspects of playground vernacular and gesture seems counter-productive.
So relentless is his use of swearing, abuse (including the insidious use of the word "gay" as a pejorative) and single-entendre that the predominant force in the auditorium becomes the nervous laughter of adolescents shocked to be sitting with their teachers while McKnight flaunts their taboos.
"It's nothing they haven't heard before", goes the defence. That, however, isn't the point. McKnight, presumably, set out to create an emotive comedy about teenage bereavement. What he has ended up with is a play which is most notable for its use of naughty words. And that, as any teacher will tell you, is neither big nor clever.
THEATRE Reviewed by Mark Brown
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article