Let It Be
Let It Be
King's Theatre, Glasgow
Alison Kerr
It's a strange one, this - a weird fusion of tribute band gig and musical theatre production - and whether you get what you expected or not probably depends on how closely you read the blurb in the theatre brochure, and if you spotted the word "concert".
For, although Let It Be is playing in a theatre, and although there is some dialogue (by way of recreations of some snippets of authentic Lennon-McCartney patter), it is essentially a concert featuring a decent tribute band performing as many of the greatest Beatles hits as it's possible to shoehorn in to a two and a half hour show.
At the outset of the opening night performance on Monday, it seemed as if there was a narrative of sorts emanating from the two retro TVs positioned high above the stage, at grand circle eye level. Archive footage of Beatlemania taking a grip across the UK then the USA, along with adverts and clips of television shows of the period, set the scene for each batch of songs. This worked particularly well for the vividly evoked Shea Stadium concert, a landmark event both in the Beatles story and the record books.
But any attempt at a narrative was abandoned during the second half, a whistlestop tour through the later Beatles hits - and funny hairdo's - accompanied by psychedelic images on the stage. Still, most of the audience looked old enough to have lived through the Beatles story, and all that mattered was having the opportunity to let their perms down, have a singalong and rediscover the inner teenybopper. Let's just hope the King's has reinforced the balconies because they have to withstand a whole lotta geriatric gyrating.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article