Cardinal Sinne
Cardinal Sinne
Tron, Glasgow
Brian Beacom
SEXUALLY opportunistic priests, morally corrupt clergymen, fundamentalist housekeepers, stupid police inspectors and easily duped journalists - what's not to like about Raymond Burke's play Cardinal Sinne?
Here's the premise: Cardinal Sinne (Grant Smeaton), the highest ranking clergymen in all of Scotland, is set to take off to Rome to play his part in electing a new Pope. But the Cardinal is perhaps not best placed to help choose God's representative on earth. So oleaginous that his wire-rimmed glasses almost slide from his face, he's also a sex pest, with a lust for young boys.
In the opening scene we discover him doing his best to lead a young priest into temptation. A journalist (Neil Anderson) turns up and accuses him of abuse. Once a young priest who found himself defiled by the Cardinal, he threatens to tell his story. The Cardinal tries to cover his tracks by claiming he is heterosexual and enlists the help of his housekeeper (Pauline Goldsmith).
Burke's play is a farce, but more Orton than Brian Rix. The writing is clever and funny and even the continual innuendo doesn't detract from the sheer fun created on stage. Smeaton drives the show along with an immense performance that is paradoxically very subtle; he's deliciously lascivious, marvellously amoral, and he delivers his lines with all the guile of a Donald Pleasance and the humour of an Alistair Sim.
Casting a harsh light on allegations of abuse of power in the church, and underlining how institutions are institutionally programmed to protect themselves, this Glasgay commission could sometimes be more pacy, and some of Smeaton's co-stars are not quite in his league, but it's sins aren't cardinal and packed congregations are assured.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article