Theatre Uncut 2014
Oran Mor, Glasgow
Mary Brennan
Something's lacking here, though it's in no way connected to the performances. The cast of four - Faith Alabi, Ruairi Conaghan, Ruth Gibson and Conor MacNeill - seize on the four short plays served up by Theatre Uncut as if there is real meat on the bone, and issues of great social/political pith and moment to be chewed over in these brief, 15-minute scripts. For sure, when Theatre Uncut first took to the stage in 2010, the format of bite-sized dramatic provocations had a raw, spontaneous energy that made less (in terms of length and production resources) offer more by way of opening up brisk debate.
Here in Scotland, under the incentive of the referendum vote, we've already had - and continue to have - our debates on iniquities within state systems, and on the policy changes that might resolve them. Perhaps that's why these four sketches, by London-based writers, are such damp squibs. A prevailing slide towards the bizarre or fantastical - avoid the bedroom tax by blowing up the bedroom (Inua Ellams) or increase Lottery revenues by giving sensation-seeking viewers a gore-fest where winners are mutilated (Anders Lustgarten) - means the writing side-steps the shocking reality of what lengths the despairing poor are already having to go. The florid, scatter-gun word-association of Clara Brennan's Pachamama froths with eco-awareness, but its poetic pile-up of images isn't really a wake-up call to respect the rights of the planet. Vivienne Franzmann's The Most Horrific comes closest to touching a raw nerve by using Facebook "likes/dislikes" responses to comic material and news bulletins - only to reveal what we knew already: sex sells, especially when celebrity and abuse are in the same headline.
Sponsored by Heineken
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article