EastEnders star Danny Dyer says he could swap the Queen Vic for 221B Baker Street and play Sherlock Holmes.
The actor, who plays pub landlord Mick Carter in the long-running soap, also said he thought he could play Doctor Who.
Asked about the rise of privately-educated actors like Benedict Cumberbatch, he told Radio Times: "I love Benedict. The Imitation Game looks amazing. He couldn't play a kid from a working-class estate, but I couldn't do what he does either.
"I think that I could play Sherlock, though, if I did it my way. Benedict's brilliant and the lines roll off his tongue, but that role is about being highly intelligent rather than posh. I think I could do Doctor Who as well.
"But there is a niche for what I do. And there's a demographic for Benedict. But it means that he's more likely to get roles in Hollywood and I'm more likely to stay living in Debden [he has a house in the Essex footballer belt]. In this country, he has got utmost respect, but if he walked into a pub, he'd get annihilated by geezers. He'd be bullied."
But Dyer blamed himself for becoming "a parody of myself and my own worst enemy" by trading on his cockney hard man image after a stint at the National Theatre.
He said: "I was working at the National, so you can't get more credible acting work anywhere in the world. But I was earning £350 a week. I was skint. So I ended up doing All Star Mr And Mrs and some series about hard men. I had children to feed, but I cringe at those documentaries now.
"Also, you had my films being sold on this image of me as a working-class gangster, even when I was trying to do something different. I did a film called Borstal Boy about a homosexual male in the 1940s and they repackaged it with a picture of me in The Football Factory on the front to make people think it was like Scum.
"There's only so much the audience will take before they feel cheated. And who's the face of it all? Who's the brand? Me. But I allowed all that to happen."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article