Why is a big word - well, it isn't, but you know what I mean - and it's one that BBC World Service presenter Mike Williams has been asking for a couple of years now in his series The Why Factor (BBC World Service, 7.30pm).
Among the questions he has pitched into the ether are "Why do we wear ties?", "Why do we lie?" and, possibly the hardest to answer, "Why do we behave so oddly in lifts?".
On Friday, he wanted to know why we go on long walks.
It was a question which involved a smattering of psychobabble - "It's about going inwards," said one interviewee; "Walking made us human," said another - but it also brought mention of philosophers Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Arthur Schopenhauer and a great deal of thought-provoking asides from people such as Jo Vergunst, a social anthropologist at the University of Aberdeen and Philip Oltermann, the author of Keeping Up With The Germans.
Vergunst talked about the simple pleasure of the rhythm of walking and about how much more easily differences can be resolved if participants walk abreast rather than stand in confrontational opposition. Suddenly those shots of off-duty world leaders strolling across well-manicured lawns together as they try to solve the world's ills start to make sense.
From Oltermann we learned that in Germany, walking is ingrained in the culture and has been since the Romantic period when wandering became what he called "a key motif".
Of course, where there is psychobabble there is also usually Will Self, and so it went here. "I've always walked," the author told Williams, while musing on his feelings of claustrophobia, of being trapped in "a virtualised topography", whatever that is.
But elsewhere Self was full of insight about the act of walking and brought no small amount of humour to the subject as well.
"Isn't walking a rejection of modernity?" asked Williams at one point, to which Self replied with a story about trying to walk to Heathrow airport and eventually running out of pavement and being faced by a sign which said: "No pedestrian access - go back to The Renaissance".
The Renaissance turned out to be a hotel.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article