Inside No 9
Thursday, 10pm, BBC Two
If you have a taste for claustrophobia and awkward, uncomfortable situations - for sticky dramas that force a random cast of strange characters together in a place with no escape, some of whom don't want to be there at all, rubbing elbows with others who want to be there far too much, and all of them heading toward crisis - this Thursday is a golden night. ITV has The Leaders' Debate (8pm). The seven party leaders are perhaps dreaming of Borgen, but it will probably turn out more like a bright frozen nightmare version of Hitchcock's Lifeboat, with Natalie Bennett in the role of most-likely-to-get-eaten, and the studio audience cast as a passing shoal of angry piranhas.
If you're still conscious by the end of those two hours, though, do your TV a massive favour and flip to BBC Two, where lurk the true current masters of sticky claustrophobia, Steve Pemberton and Reece Shearsmith, with the latest of their unexpected tales from Inside No 9. If there is one thing that honestly deserves not to be missed this week, this is it.
The second series of Shearsmith and Pemberton's anthology show, in which each week a new story unfolds inside a different "Number 9", got off to a fine start last week, with an episode that cunningly replayed the sardines situation that launched the original series last year. Instead of a group of partygoers reluctantly crammed together in a wardrobe, a bunch of strangers shared the close horror of having to sleep beside each other in the cramped couchette of an intercontinental train. It was uneasy, coarse, excruciating, grotesque and hilarious, with black humour dolloped on top, and an unsettling secret twist hidden beneath - in short, it was what all the best Number 9s have been.
The greatest thing about the anthology format, however, is the most obvious thing: it's different every week. Entering Number 9, you never know quite what you're going to get. While it might seem like Pemberton and Shearsmith have imposed severe limitations on themselves with the restricted conditions of their short, single-location stories, the opposite is true. These tales might be confined within four walls but, in there, feeding off the intense atmosphere, the writers are exploding in all kinds of directions.
Certainly they are with this week's episode, which sees them stretching into territory utterly unlike anything the pair have ever tackled in the past. To say much about the story, which is called The 12 Days Of Christine, would spoil it, but it's safe to state some facts. The setting is, mostly, Flat 9 in a humdrum high-rise. And there we find Christine, an ordinary young woman, played quite extraordinarily by Sheridan Smith.
It is directed again by Guillem Morales, the Spanish filmmaker who did a beautiful job exploring the corners of that train compartment last week. But it exists a world away from last week's jaunt. There are jokes, but they are mostly the passing jokes people share in real life, and it's not really a comedy. If there's a bleak, black humour working here, it's of the rarest sort, the kind that is filled with sympathy and tenderness. There are ghostly jumps and flickers, but it's not really a horror story, either, except maybe it is. But it knocked me sideways, in ways I wasn't expecting at all, and which I can't get out of my head. It is, by a shattering distance, the best use of 30 minutes on TV this week.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article