When people think of The Exorcist, William Friedkin's vomit-spattered 1973 hit, the first things that come to mind tend to be the funny voices, levitation, head spinning and pea-soup-spewing of the young Linda Blair, who plays the 12-year-old girl possessed by something nasty.
All that boogie-boogie stuff is fun. What truly haunts you about Friedkin's film isn't the shocks and scares, however, but the drab normality with which he frames them. There's a mundane winter gloom in the little town's shabby streets, and the sad priests patrolling them have the drab horror of living in their faces.
Sky's tingling three-part paranormal chiller The Enfield Haunting isn't The Exorcist but, as Exorcist rip-offs go, it's not bad at all.
As with Friedkin's film, it sprinkles a little "True Story" garnish over the daft proceedings, in this case the then-widely-reported story of an anonymous house in the London of 1977, apparently targeted by a foul-mouthed poltergeist.
In the mid-1970s, with The Exorcist craze at full strength - 1977 saw the release of The Exorcist II, starring Richard Burton in one of the roles he took purely so he could afford to keep drinking - stories like that were all the rage in Britain's school playgrounds. The first neat touch writer Joshua St Johnston applies here is to make the two daughters of the house exactly those kind of kids.
Sharing their cramped bedroom, beneath the gaze of their Starsky & Hutch posters, the older Margaret tells her sister, 11-year-old Janet, goosebumpy urban-legend-style horror stories each night at lights out.
Johnston and Danish director Kristoffer Nyholm (The Killing) have a good sense of this stuff. It's their feel for dim, dull, downbeat domestic 1970s texture that makes The Enfield Haunting - and which gives the shocks, when they come, extra jolt: there's one lovely little fright involving a View-Master, which I enjoyed as much for the Proustian rush as the creepy scare.
There's a contrast with the BBC's 1970s spy throwback, The Game: in that, the period recreation can feel like a carefully dingy fashion photoshoot; here, everything just feels ordinary and right.
Settling into it like a tired man into a well-worn sofa comes Timothy Spall, with a great, rumbling performance as Maurice Grosse, an aging, fledgling spook hunter called to investigate the paranormal activity, and who quickly gets out of his depth. He's soon joined by professional ghostbuster Guy Lyon Playfair (Matthew Macfadyen), an aristocratic celebrity expert in psychic investigation circles, parachuted in like the sceptical Jason King to Grosse's working-class walrus.
The two are great together Â- in the melancholy spirit of The Exorcist's priests, both characters have seen things they wish they hadn't. But it's Spall who steals it, beautifully tender, scared and flummoxed, and warily wanting to believe.
The real double act to watch is the delightful relationship between him and young Eleanor Worthington-Cox, who is fantastic as Janet, the girl the poltergeist targets, and who is soon doing the full Linda Blair.
In the scheme of great British TV ghost stories, The Enfield Haunting doesn't have the piercing starkness, strangeness and ambition of something like The Stone Tape. But seeing Spall and Macfadyen go about their weird work made me think of odd old programmes like that; I had the curious, nostalgic sensation of having stayed up late to watch a programme I wasn't allowed to. It's a shame it's lurking behind the Sky paywall. If it had been on proper telly, everybody would be talking about it at school tomorrow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.Â
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.Â
That is invaluable.Â
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article