There are times in Mark Baldwin's cleverly exuberant new piece – Seven for a secret, never to be told – when one almost expects Martin Jarvis's voice to start reading a Just William story.
Not just because the boisterous little lads in their 1950s apparel, and the madcap girls in chintzy frocks, often evoke characters out of post-war Richmal Crompton, but because of the mood conjured up by Baldwin’s witty, harum-scarum choreography.
As the dancers run happy riot, playing giddy games under the green shade of Michael Howells’s willow-fronded dell, the energy unleashed in tusslings, chasings, pillow fights and make-believe adventures has all the high-spirited spontaneity of carefree early years.
The insights into childhood behaviour supplied by scientist Nicky Clayton have encouraged Baldwin to let his own ideas skip and whirl in dynamic response to Stephen McNeff’s exquisite orchestral adaptation of Ravel’s L’enfant et les sortileges. But if Seven for a secret ... packs a mighty, magical feel-good factor for audiences, it’s not a doddle to dance. Eryck Brahmania and Dane Hurst excel in solos of fleet-footed complexity, but everyone’s kept on their toes. The same is true, albeit with a different set of challenges, in Paul Taylor’s Roses. Lyrical elegance is sparked through with frisky cartwheels but nothing derails the romance of this iconic American’s creamy-smooth choreography for six couples. And again, the Rambert dancers shine, as they do in the opening work, Cardoon Club. A bit of shimmy-shallying flummery that has strutted all its stuff after 10 minutes, but like the zombie-esque night-trippers it portrays, simply refuses to lie down and die. Great live music, though.
HHHH
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article