"I'VE always loved the word 'penultimate'," confided Stephane Deneve by way of his penultimate podium chat.
"But I'm not sure I love the meaning of it just now." He went on to make a slightly macabre link between his own "life cycle" and the piece he'd be conducting in the second half, the Rite of Spring; Stravinsky's pagan girl dances herself to death, while Deneve is only moving to Stuttgart.
Anyway, there was a definite sense of occasion to Deneve's second-last programme as music director of the RNSO – not least thanks to the stellar presence of Canadian violinist James Ehnes. If you know Ehnes by his recordings, you might have been pleasantly surprised by his husky live sound, whose audible bow changes and "wolf notes" (undertones) add a depth of character.
His account of Barber's Violin Concerto was earnest and searching and extremely moving, not the blithe Americana some make the piece. He was generous spirit, too, with two encores: Paganini's 24th Caprice – oodles of notes but not a single one misplaced – and, highlight of the evening, a radiant and peaceful third movement of Bach's third solo sonata.
But this was meant to be Deneve's night, and it opened hot on the heels of the orchestra's recent (and very fine) Debussy album with the Prelude a l'apres-midi d'un faune. Flautist Katherine Bryan made the first few bars gorgeously voluptuous, but generally Deneve failed to match the fluidity of the recording. The first bars of Stravinsky were marred by a wayward hearing aid in the auditorium; Deneve looked irritated enough to restart, but didn't. He never seemed to fully relax after that, but the orchestra played for him with ferocious vigour nonetheless.
HHH
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article