I was much tickled to be told that John Osborne played his Fringe hit show to its largest audience ever in Perth on Wednesday evening.
That audience numbered close to 400 souls and they had chosen the performance from the brochure of the Perth Festival of the Arts. It speaks volumes for both the enquiring nature of the festival's audience and the continued potency of John Peel's name that the organisers of the event so exceeded their box office target.
In its fringe theatre way, Osborne's memoir monologue is not quite what it says on the tin. It is much more about Osborne than Peel, although the influential DJ is the catalyst at key points in the narrative. The box of discs Osborne won in an ad hoc competition on Peel's radio show provides a very vague framework for the piece, but those who expected some original insight into the sonic obscurities of rock and pop that both Peel and Osborne champion will have gone home disappointed.
Osborne's purpose is to show the difference that tuning into Peel, and an obsession with radio in general, made to his development as a human being, and to share what he has learned about the effect of radio-listening on others.
His performance, while confident enough, comes with the self-consciously hand-knitted props of inexpertly cued vinyl platters and an overhead projector. It is quite charming in its own way, but some distance, I expect, from An Audience with Tim Brooke-Taylor, which will be playing the same space tomorrow evening as part of the festival.
Osborne's most important achievement this week was to take his (largish) audience in an unfamiliar direction. How very Peel that is.
HHH
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article