HHH
I SEEM to remember in the past commenting on the intelligence of the playing of South Korean pianist Sinae Lee (it might have been in relation to Liszt's B minor Sonata). Certainly yesterday her recital at the RCS was informed at every level by intellegence: of planning, of structuring and of playing.
The idea of putting together a programme compounded of "First Steps", as she termed it – the first piano sonatas by Brahms, Alban Berg (his only piano sonata) and Henri Dutilleux - looked good on paper and worked well as a coherent recital programme.
Lee demonstrated multiple strengths in the Brahms, which can sound overlong, ungainly and even a bit ramshackle in the wrong hands.
She brought a commanding sense of structure and purpose to her performance, along with a potent mix of strength, power, poetry and sensitivity.
From time to time she seemed to drive it a bit, with a fearsome brightness close to a glare, through that might have been the merciless acoustic of the RCS's Guinness Room.
Alban Berg's Piano Sonata opus 1 worked less well, in my view. Lee's vision of the music came over as though the piece is a big-boned, late-Romantic miniature epic, with huge and thickly textured climaxes.
I see it more as an essentially inward piece, and I certainly didn't hear as much of the counterpoint and the complex motivic work as I would have liked.
The Dutilleux Sonata was a fun piece with its rolling rhythms and tolling bells, not quite knowing at points whether it wanted to be Bartok or Messiaen when it found its own voice.
A good start to the term.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article