THE SCO paid a price on Friday night for an unusual programme with a number of rarities on the playlist: a low turnout.
Yet the line-up of composers was hardly a scare-list, with music by Mendelssohn and Schumann featuring prominently, and only one "modern" piece on the programme.
Perhaps the fact that the Mendelssohn piece, his brassy Trumpet Overture, though full of hints of the Mendelssohn to come, is little-played, might be a factor. As too might be Schumann's Cello Concerto, often dismissed and largely ignored by orchestras. But the performance of the Mendelssohn, exuberantly directed by Andrew Manze, suggested the piece deserves a place in the repertoire.
And the playing of the Schumann, with SCO principal cellist David Watkin as soloist, urgently suggested a re-think of the concerto, a much better piece than many people allow. Watkin's beautiful performance, capturing the drama and the poetry of the music, with its melting little co-ordination in the brief slow movement between soloist and the acting leader of the cello section, exquisitely characterised the intimacy of the music of this most individual of Romantic composers. Watkin followed the concerto with a heart-stopping encore in the Allemande from Bach's Sixth Cello Suite, one of those soulful contemplations where time stops and all that remains is the concentration of the moment enshrined in music: philosophy in sound.
After Rolf Martinsson's expressive homage to Schoenberg's Transfigured Night, Manze and the SCO, brilliantly energetic and zestful, cleared the air with a dashing performance of Beethoven's First Symphony, with the music so fresh and exhilarating the symphony felt newly-minted.
HHHH
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article