Buena Onda: New Brazilian Film
by Demetrios Matheou
Prizes at film festivals rarely have as much significance as the Golden Bear won by Walter Salles's Central Station in Berlin in 1998. The success of this bitter-sweet road movie literally heralded the return of Brazilian cinema to the world stage.
Its film industry had been buffeted by 21 years of dictatorship, followed by democracy marred by corruption and economic disarray. The biggest blow was struck in 1991 when the first democratically elected president withdrew all state support for culture. Not one Brazilian film was made that year, leading director Hector Babenco to declare "Brazilian cinema is dead".
Salles's breakthrough eight years later was part of the rebirth of the country's cinema as a new generation of highly motivated directors drew on their country's difficult but colourful recent history for their stories. And if Salles nudged the door ajar in terms of international awareness, Fernando Meirelles's City Of God blew it open in 2002.
A vibrant account of the drug war in Rio's favelas, it was a massive hit in Brazil and abroad and followed an old tradition of looking at the country's social problems, but reflecting the new phenomenon of drugs and heavily armed gangs. It was the trailblazer for a new kind of crime movie.
Then came Hector Babenco's prison drama Carandiru and José Padilha's Elite Squad, which dealt with police corruption. Elite Squad 2 is now the highest grossing film in Brazil's history. And that, for us, has become a problem. In reality, favela films are just a few of the 100-odd movies made each year in what is now an economically upbeat country. But they are the only ones unadventurous distributors and cinema owners tend to present to the British public.
Truth be told, Brazilian comedies, especially those influenced by the telenovelas so popular in Brazil, are never likely to work with our audiences: they can be awful. There is also a penchant for music biopics too whimsical and parochial to catch on abroad. But there is a huge variety of Brazilian films which have nothing to do with crime or TV. Some of my favourites include The Year My Parents Went On Vacation, which combined dictatorship, soccer and a young boy's coming of age; House Of Sand, a historical, romantic drama set in the desert; Lower City, a visceral and vibrant portrait of street hustlers and prostitutes in Salvador; the unsettling Happy Desert, about a young woman's yearning to escape her dreary life; Adrift, a subtle family drama; and Suely In The Sky, about a woman's attempt to control her destiny in the country's dusty, deprived north-east.
Those films encapsulate some of the themes and characteristics of the best Brazilian cinema: an engagement with the country's history, regions and landscape, the poverty of the north and disillusionment of the young, in stories spun with style and imagination. Brazil also has some of the best documentary makers in the world, not least Padilha, who balances his high-octane Elite Squad movies with documentaries which engage with his society's many iniquities.
This diversity is in evidence in the Buena Onda Brazilian strand of the Glasgow Film Festival. The documentary The Day That Lasted 21 Years is an absorbing, revelatory account of the US backing of Brazil's military dictatorship. Also harking back to the dictatorship, but with a typically Brazilian quirkiness, Prime Time Soap's characters seek escape from repression through telenovelas and disco.
A different kind of period piece, Xingu is an uplifting true account of three brothers trying to create a national park as a means of protecting the indigenous people.
Southwest is a mysterious fable, shot in widescreen black-and-white, at the centre of which is a female character whose whole life passes in a single day. In stark contrast, and more in keeping with the buoyant Brazil we think we know, the GFF programmers are screening the 1959 Oscar-winning Black Orpheus, set during the Rio carnival – before whisking punters off for a night of samba. If only they could throw in some Brazilian weather.
For screening details, see www.glasgowfilm.org/festival
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article